| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2432
|
Posted - 2014.06.06 12:28:00 -
[1] - Quote
Eve Online as a 'game' may be doing okay, but one has to wonder how well or not, CCP as a company is doing.
The good folk from CCP simply posting that they are' super excited' in support of each other in the forums with each new addition to the game, (loot spew for example) is not the same thing as getting approval from us, you know, the folk who pay their wages.
I have played Eve Online for quite some time now and I really want CCP to be successful, for them, because it pays their wages, and for us so we have a good game to spend money on and play.
Between staff leaving and layoffs, reading the tea leaves, it all seems a bit worrying right now. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2439
|
Posted - 2014.06.07 13:14:00 -
[2] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Tippia wrote:epicurus ataraxia wrote:You are both right in a way, dinsdale does identify reasons why it is overall a nerf to highsec, but I disagree with his core assumption that it is deliberately a boost to the Goons. Where does he do that? He keeps saying it is, but when pressed, he consistently fails to produce any kind of answer. Hence my question. Talk about willful blindness. I learned long ago that debating with you is impossible. Dealing with you is like dealing with someone who thinks the bible is a literal history of the world, or a global warming denier. The nerfs to high sec with Crius have been documented by umpteen bloggers (for one highly respected one it was the last straw) plus posters in this forum. I will continue to ignore your posts as much as I can, because I certainly have no interest in matching the quantity that you pump out, nor the obtuseness.
The best way to manage Tippia, is to let him have the last word as quickly as possible. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2440
|
Posted - 2014.06.07 13:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:The best way to manage Tippia, is to let him have the last word as quickly as possible. Yeah, sad but true. Not really, no. The best way to manage me is to not rely on fallacies GÇö especially ad hominems GÇö to try to carry your (lack of) argument. Instead, provide sources, data, and reasoning. Actually engage in the argumentation rather than desperately trying to dodge everything.
My dear Tippia, some time ago you claimed that suicide ganking figures must be down as you personally had not been ganked somewhere or other for some time.
You provided absolutely no evidence to support your assertion, but just kept repeating that as you had not been suicide ganked where ever it was for some time, it was therefore, proof that the levels of suicide ganking must be on the decline for the game as a whole.
As ever, you may now have the last word, or be a devil and just not post for once.
This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2440
|
Posted - 2014.06.07 13:59:00 -
[4] - Quote
Lady Zarrina wrote:It really is too bad this thread didn't stay on topic for a few more days.
You are right, I apologize for side tracking the thread. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2440
|
Posted - 2014.06.07 14:04:00 -
[5] - Quote
Tippia wrote:[quote=Josef Djugashvilis]My dear Tippia, some time ago you claimed that suicide ganking figures must be down as you personally had not been ganked somewhere or other for some time. Are you quite sure I didn't just rhetorically ask why I never saw any in spite of some unsupported claim that they were more common than ever? Or are you just traipsing needlessly into fallacy territory? Oh, and what on earth does it have to do with the topic at hand other than to try to evade it and turn it into a very oblique argument against me, personally?
My experience was the evidence to support my assertions about my experience of the matter, as a step up from the (pretty much always) unsupported claim of things going in the other direction. It's not rocket surgery, you knowGǪ[/quote
Some times I think you are my younger brother in real life, but I have checked with him and he does not play Eve Online  This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2440
|
Posted - 2014.06.07 14:25:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Some times I think you are my younger brother in real life, but I have checked with him and he does not play Eve Online  So that's a GÇ£noGÇ¥ then. Remember how I explaiend to you that your best course of action was to provide sources and data, and to not rely on fallacies? On learning this, you picked a path that relies on unsupported claims and fallacies. Now, I just have to ask: did this strategy really sound like a good idea when you laid it out for yourself?
Wow, just freakin' wow man. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2441
|
Posted - 2014.06.08 12:57:00 -
[7] - Quote
I hope Dr Eyjo went of to greener pastures to further his career rather than as a 'man in the know' leaving a sinking ship.
I am all in favour of the massive ship re-balancing and the improvements to industry etc, but it would help if CCP shared its vision of the games future in a bit more detail than 'stuff'
I only do day (death) trips to null, but would love to see the entire thing overhauled so that the folk there can enjoy it more, and perhaps encourage small stakeholders (remember them?) to move there.
I am always sorry to see folk laid off from any job and wish them all a good, employed future. This is not a signature. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2444
|
Posted - 2014.06.09 06:42:00 -
[8] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:I hope Dr Eyjo went off to greener pastures to further his career rather than as a 'man in the know' leaving a sinking ship.
I believe he is now in charge of Icelands university.
I am aware of that, but what I posted still stands.
But thank you for being helpful by bring this fact to the attention of those who were not aware of the good Dr career move. This is not a signature. |
| |
|